The Drone Attack Against Venezuelan President – Part I

Venezuelan Drone Attack: Separating What We Know from What We Don’t

Steve Ellner argues that there is plenty of misinformation and rumours surrounding the terrorist attack, and that it is important to base any analysis of the deeds on facts.

A DJIM600 drone which was used in the attack against President Maduro (Ultimas Noticias)

A DJIM600 drone which was used in the attack against President Maduro (Ultimas Noticias)

By Steve Ellner – Latin American Advisor


The first step in analyzing the Venezuelan drone incident is separating what we know from what we don’t. Unfortunately, much of the media and many political actors have not been rigorous in striving to achieve objectivity. As a result of their partiality, the event has ended up emboldening followers on both sides in Venezuela

Abundant evidence indicates that the attack was not staged by Maduro. Various government adversaries (such as former police chief Salvatore Lucchese) have taken credit for it or recognized that they knew about it before-hand (Miami-based TV host Jaime Bayly). That such an action was carried out should not be surprising given the barrage of threats of military intervention, support for a military coup and the like coming from powerful U.S. actors (President Trump, Senator Marco Rubio, etc.) – statements that invigorate members of the Venezuelan opposition who contemplate extra-legal tactics. Furthermore, anti-Chavistas have engaged in violence to achieve regime change on numerous occasions.

We don’t know all the specifics of who organized the attempted drone attack. But statements coming from the U.S. and European Union and the wording used by the commercial media indicate doubts as to whether Maduro’s adversaries were behind it. In sharp contrast with reporting on terrorist activity elsewhere, the printed media consistently places quotation marks around the term “assassination attempt.”

The narrative that blames Maduro for the incident encourages radicalization. But Venezuelan independents who generally reject both Maduro and the opposition condemn the attempt and support the government’s side, as they have in response to the U.S.-imposed financial embargo and other actions by international actors, an observation recently made by Venezuelanalysis reporter Paul Dobson.


Steve Ellner taught economic history and political science at the Universidad de Oriente in Venezuela from 1977 to 2003. He is the editor of The Pink Tide Experiences: Breakthroughs and Shortcomings in Twenty-First Century Latin America (Rowman and Littlefield, 2019).

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Venezuelanalysis editorial staff.

Creative Commons LicenceThis work is licensed under a Attribution Non-commercial No DerivativesCreative Commons license


About ivarjordre

painter, activist, writer, revolutionary, human
Dette innlegget vart posta under Imperialism, Latin-Amerika, Our global world, Politic&Society og merkt , , , , , , , . Bokmerk permalenkja.

Legg att eit svar

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: logo

Du kommenterer no med din. Logg ut /  Endre )

Google photo

Du kommenterer no med Google-kontoen din. Logg ut /  Endre )


Du kommenterer no med Twitter-kontoen din. Logg ut /  Endre )


Du kommenterer no med Facebook-kontoen din. Logg ut /  Endre )

Koplar til %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.