Palestine resolution: US ‘unresolved’ ahead of Security Council meeting

December 17, 2014 –

Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat (R) and US Secretary of State John Kerry (AFP Photo / Brendan Smialowsky)

Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat (R) and US Secretary of State John Kerry (AFP Photo / Brendan Smialowsky)

The Palestinian Authority is filing a UN resolution demanding a full Israeli pull-out from the occupied territories within two years. Meanwhile, the US is unsure what it wants to see from the resolution.

Officials in Ramallah warned they would press ahead with Wednesday’s Security Council bid in spite of American opposition, just as US Secretary of State John Kerry was still trying to find common ground between the Palestinians and Israelis this week.

«We will submit our project to the UN Security Council tomorrow [Wednesday],» Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas told journalists late on Tuesday.

The motion, among other things, will push for Israeli withdrawal beyond the pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem becoming its capital, and advance the process of a two-state solution. It will be submitted by Jordan, as Palestine is still an observer at the Security Council. Only the 15 members can file motions.

But Washington is still likely to veto the Wednesday resolution in New York, despite the risk of greater alienation from a Europe that is increasingly vocal on the issue of Israeli aggression against Palestine. The US has supported Israel with its veto power dozens of times throughout the last seven decades.

Chief Arab League negotiator for Palestine Saeb Erekat told RT in Ramallah that “if the bill is approved we are going to move in the direction of Palestine’s accession, to other UN agencies, conventions and protocols, including the International Criminal Court.”

Members of the European Parliament take part in a voting session at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, December 16, 2014 (Reuters / Vincent Kessler)

Members of the European Parliament take part in a voting session at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, December 16, 2014 (Reuters / Vincent Kessler)

The American role in all this continues to be unclear at this point, as the secretary of state still wouldn’t admit if there was a version of the document that Washington could get behind, telling journalists in London that there were “no determinations about language, approaches, specific resolutions, any of that.”

«This isn’t the time to detail private conversations or speculate on a UN Security Council resolution that hasn’t even been tabled, no matter what pronouncements are made publicly about it,” he added.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continued to be adamantly against the motion throughout the week, warning that “terrorists” would run wild if Palestine were free.

«Attempts of the Palestinians and of several European countries to force conditions on Israel will only lead to a deterioration in the regional situation and will endanger Israel,» he warned in a statement.

Kerry, despite admitting that a two-state solution is important, warned that nothing can be allowed to derail March’s snap elections in Israel.

He said they were mindful they had to «carefully calibrate» any steps that were taken and it was «imperative to lower the temperature» in the region to find a path for peace wanted by both Israelis and Palestinians.

«The status quo is unsustainable for both parties,» he said. «Right now what we are trying to do is have a constructive conversation with everybody to find the best way to go forward.»

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (AFP Photo / Oliver Weiken)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (AFP Photo / Oliver Weiken)

EU pursues pro-Palestine path

Over in Strasbourg, the EU showed a similar hesitation to the idea of an independent Palestine, as lawmakers agreed to a compromise involving more peace talks with Israel, stopping just short of a symbolic consensus on independence.

A center-right European People’s Party (EPP) and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) – the largest and second-largest groups in parliament respectively – said that recognition shouldn’t be taken in isolation from other requirements.

“[The EP] supports in principle recognition of Palestinian statehood and the two-state solution, and believes these should go hand in hand with the development of peace talks, which should be advanced.”

The UK, Spain, Ireland, France and Portugal have all shown their symbolic support, while Sweden went as far as to recognize officially an independent state of Palestine.

Meanwhile, France is spearheading its own alternative to the UN resolution, also calling for a two-year deadline. But instead of demanding Israeli withdrawal, it proposes this as a deadline for an agreement on a peace treaty.

Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s foreign minister, believes that a friendship with Western Europe and North America is more important than reacting to Palestine with “fanatical” narratives.

“I think the approach of some people from the fanatic school brings us to a confrontation not with the Arab world, but with our best friends in the Western world – in Western Europe and North America… today, specifically, because there is a crisis here.”


Palestinian statehood


Breakaway regions, Court, Israel, Law, Middle East, Politics, UN, USA, War

About ivarjordre

painter, activist, writer, revolutionary, human
Dette innlegget vart posta under Palestina, Politic&Society, Politikk, samfunn og merkt , , , , , , . Bokmerk permalenkja.

Legg att eit svar

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: logo

Du kommenterer no med din. Logg ut /  Endre )

Google photo

Du kommenterer no med Google-kontoen din. Logg ut /  Endre )


Du kommenterer no med Twitter-kontoen din. Logg ut /  Endre )


Du kommenterer no med Facebook-kontoen din. Logg ut /  Endre )

Koplar til %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.