Demokratiet i Bolivia må gjenopprettes

Latin-Amerikagruppene i Norge krever at den norske regjering fordømmer statskuppet i Bolivia og USAs påviste innblanding. Norge må ta avstand fra overgrep mot tilhengere av Morales, folkevalgte og urfolk, og bør støtte Mexicos arbeid for å få internasjonale organer som OAS og FN til å kreve at konstitusjonell orden må gjenopprettes og at landets folkevalgte president må gjeninnsettes.

Det pågår et kupp i Bolivia. Evo Morales gikk ikke av frivillig, men ble tvunget til å gjøre det av militæret. Sikkerheten hans var truet, og han er nå i Mexico hvor han nå har fått politisk asyl. Mange ledere og medlemmer av Kongressen fra regjeringspartiet MAS har trukket seg grunnet reelle trusler om represalier fra militære, politi og opposisjonen. Voldelige grupperinger med tilknytning til opposisjonen har gått løs på Morales sine tilhengere med grov vold. Disse har til og med brutt seg inn og vandalisert Morales sin bolig (1).

Hovedaktørene i militærkuppet mot Bolivias folkevalgte president Evo Morales er den økonomiske eliten og rasistiske grupper på høyresiden som i full åpenhet viser sin avsky mot urfolk (2). WikiLeaks har publisert hemmeligstemplede dokumenter fra USAs ambassade i Bolivia (3), hvor det avdekkes at USA over flere år har finansiert og støttet de samme voldelige og rasistiske elitekreftene som nå har klart å avsette den første regjeringen i Bolivias historie med røtter i landet sitt undertrykte urfolk.

Opposisjonspolitiker og visepresident i Senatet, Jeanine  Añez,  ble innsatt som interimpresident 12. november. Añez ble innsatt uten at Kongressen hadde quorum og dermed ikke var vedtaksdyktige.  Dette er i strid med artikkel 169 av den bolivianske grunnloven. Flere representanter i Underhuset og Senatet har sagt opp etter statskuppet og situasjonen i Kongressen burde vært normalisert før vedtak ble fattet (4).

Situasjonen i Bolivia har eskalert siden presidentvalget 20. oktober og det påståtte valgfusket har vært hovedargumentet for å rettferdiggjøre Morales sin avgang. The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), som har blant deres rådgivere Nobelprisvinnere Robert Solow og Joseph Stiglitz, uttalte at OAS ikke har lagt frem «evidence of irregularities» (5) og heller ikke at «fraud affected the official result that gave President Evo Morales a first-round victory»  og at «in the end, the official count, which is legally binding and completely transparent, with the tally sheets available online, closely matched the rapid count results” (6). De udokumenterte påstandene om at Morales vant presidentvalget grunnet valgfusk og den raske anerkjennelsen av Añez, undergraver OAS sin troverdighet som demokratisk institusjon i regionen.

Latin-Amerikagruppene i Norge krever at den norske regjering fordømmer statskuppet i Bolivia og USAs påviste innblanding (7). Norge må ta avstand fra overgrep mot tilhengere av Morales, folkevalgte og urfolk, og bør støtte Mexicos arbeid for å få internasjonale organer som OAS og FN til å kreve at konstitusjonell orden må gjenopprettes og at landets folkevalgte president må gjeninnsettes.

Landsstyret i LAG, 15. november 2019

(1) https://www.nodal.am/2019/11/b…

(2) https://www.theguardian.com/co…

(3) https://www.mintpressnews.com/…

(4) https://www.lavozdetarija.com/…

(5) http://cepr.net/press-center/press-releases/no-evidence-that-bolivian-election-results-were-affected-by-irregularities-or-fraud-statistical-analysis-shows

(6) http://cepr.net/images/stories…

(7) https://www.whitehouse.gov/bri…

 

Først publisert 16.11.2019 på latin-amerikagruppene.no

Posta under Latin-Amerika, Our global world, Politikk, samfunn | Merkt , , , , , , , , , , | Kommenter innlegget

Norske politiske klakørar og våpeneksporten

Norge vil utvide våpeneksporten

<p>Den norsk-utviklede lille dronen «Black Hornet» har vært en stor suksess og er brukt på slagmarken i blant annet Afghanistan. Nå arbeides det for eksport av flere slike økonomiske og teknologiske suksesser.</p>

Den norsk-utviklede lille dronen «Black Hornet» har vært en stor suksess og er brukt på slagmarken i blant annet Afghanistan. Nå arbeides det for eksport av flere slike økonomiske og teknologiske suksesser. Foto: Espen Hansen Riise/ Forsvaret

 

Norsk våpenindustri vil knytte seg ennå nærmere USAs enorme marked. Og myndighetene ønsker fortgang i dette.

 

Norge er allerede en verdensledende våpeneksportør. Ingen andre land er i nærheten av å eksportere 75 prosent av all produksjon, slik vi gjør. Halvparten av eksporten går til USA, noe som gjør Norge til verdens fjerde største våpeneksportør til storebror i Nato.

Materielldirektør Morten Tiller i Forsvarsdepartementet ønsker å sikre norsk våpeneksport for fremtiden. Arkivfoto: Gorm Kallestad/ NTB scanpix
Materielldirektør Morten Tiller i Forsvarsdepartementet ønsker å sikre norsk våpeneksport for fremtiden. Arkivfoto: Gorm Kallestad/ NTB scanpix

 

Nå arbeider man for å beholde eksisterende avtaler og samtidig finne nye veier inn til verdens største våpenmarked, USA. Ambisjonen er å bli inkludert i utvalget av land som regnes som en av landets nasjonale forsvarsindustribase, og som dermed lettere vil kunne selge til USA.

Opprinnelig var det bare Canada som hadde en slik status, men i 2016 ble det som kalles National Technology Industrial Base (NTIB) utvidet til også å omfatte Storbritannia og Australia.

– Norge vil prøve å bli med, sa Morten Tiller, materielldirektør i Forsvarsdepartementet (FD), på en konferanse i Oslo tirsdag morgen.

Nye premisser for verden

I fasjonable Oslo militære samfunn var da salen fullsatt av industriaktører, ansatte i ulike departementer, samt interesserte i forsvars- og sikkerhetspolitikk og forsvarsindustriutvikling.

Konferansen baserte seg på en rapport skrevet av Bill Greenwalt, tilknyttet tenketanken Atlantic council hvor tidligere markante personer som Henry Kissinger, Joseph S. Nye, Bernt Scowcroft og Condoleezza Rice sitter i ledelsen.

Greenwalt jobbet tidligere tett sammen med avdøde John MacCain for å endre systemer og innkjøpsprosedyrer i USA. Rapporten hans er blant annet sponset av Innovasjon Norge.

Amerikanske Greenwalt mente det amerikanske innkjøpsproblemet var «crazy», og måtte endres. Han ble kontaktet av MacCain etter at Russland annekterte Krim i 2014, og Kina begynte å vise militære muskler i Sør-Kina-havet rundt samme tid.

Det ble klart at USAs teknologiske forsprang hadde minsket og endog var forbigått på enkelte områder. Erkjennelsen førte til at USAs system for innkjøp og godkjennelser ble endret, og i 2016 inkluderte man altså to nære allierte i NTIB.

Utfordring fra Kina

En del av amerikansk lovgivning som setter begrensinger er International Trafficking in Arms Regulation (ITAR). For å få selge militært utstyr til USA må man akseptere en mengde bestemmelser og amerikansk kontroll.

Dette var fornuftig i en situasjon hvor USA var teknologisk overlegne, men hemmet utviklingen av nye våpen og systemer når situasjonen ikke lengre var slik, påpekte Greenwalt som også har jobbet for Pentagon.

Greenwalt trakk også frem Kinas enorme menneskelige ressurser og mente dette kunne møtes av et utvidet samarbeid mellom de Nato-allierte, Japan og Sør-Korea.

– Da blir ikke Kina så stort lengre, sa han på konferansen som ble arrangert av Forsvarets forskninginstitutt (FFI) og Forsvars- og sikkerhetsindustriens forening (FSi). Hans rapport er tilgjengelig på institutets hjemmesider (ekstern lenke).

FDs materielldirektør fryktet at en videre utvikling av samarbeidet internt blant dagens NTIB-land kunne gjøre det vanskeligere for norsk våpenindustri å få adgang til det lukrative markedet.

– Norge må forbli leverandør til USAs væpnede styrker, sa Morten Tiller som samtidig understreket at det norske forsvaret må ha tilgang til militært utstyr fra USA.

I panelet satt også representanter for norsk våpenindustri. En av dem var svært tydelig på hva det handlet om:

– Regjeringer skal levere sikkerhet. Det skal også våpenindustrien, men den skal også tjene penger. USA handler nå om penger, markedet er enormt, sa Kjell Kringsjå, visepresident for Nammos forretningsutvikling. Hele 41 prosent av selskapets omsetning skjer for tiden i USA, og Kringsjå kunne også opplyse at selskapet snart ville ha flere ansatte i USA enn i Norge.

Posta under Politikk, samfunn, Vår globale verd | Merkt , , , , , , , , , , | Kommenter innlegget

This is what a right-wing coup look like – Example Bolivia

This is Bad: The Bolivian Military Coup Explained

Very Very Bad.

Anti-Morales protestors in Bolivia

Amidst mobs, looting, and violent attacks, President Evo Morales of Bolivia resigned yesterday after losing both the support of the police and the military. Mobs supporting Morales and his opponent Carlos Mesa, have been wreaking havoc since the election on October 20th.

Some police officers remain loyal to Morales, however due to conflicting orders from their commanders they have been prevented from restoring order to the cities (La Paz and El Alto, among others) that have been most afflicted by the mobs and protests. After assailants ransacked and destroyed his home, Morales and his sister fled the capital. They remain in Bolivia, about 200 miles east of their former residences.

Eric Blanc @_ericblanc

Everybody needs to watch this video. Horrific.

Masked members of Bolivia’s rightwing opposition assaulted Patricia Arce (the mayor of Vinto), dragged her through the streets barefoot, covered her in red paint, & forcibly cut off her hair.

This is what a coup looks like.

Max Blumenthal

@MaxBlumenthal

The squalid US-backed fanatics of the Bolivian right ransack the house of the country’s elected president, Evo Morales. And the havoc is just beginning. Let no one call them “pro-democracy.”

Bolivia has now been without a head of state for around 24 hours, and the Bolivian congress is meeting to try and determine who will take up the interim mantle. Alvaro Garcia, Morales’s vice president also resigned, along with both heads of congress. Opposition lawmaker and second vice president of the senate, Jeanine Añez, has claimed that she should be named interim president.

“It falls upon me to assume this challenge with the only objective of calling new elections,” Añez told reporters on Sunday.

Whether members of Morales’s Movement Towards Socialism party, which holds about two-thirds of the seats in Congress, support Añez and show up for the special session remains to be seen.

Despite being forced to resign after General Williams Kaliman (head of the armed forces) read a statement encouraging Morales to do so, Morales reminded his followers in his televised statement that “the fight doesn’t end here. This isn’t a betrayal of the social movements, the fight continues. We are the people.”

But how the hell did this happen? 

So glad you asked.

Evo Morales was the first indigenous president of Bolivia – whose population is majority indigenous. He is extremely popular (especially in the more rural parts of the country) and has overseen a major economic upswing for the country.

Initially, having reached his term limits, he was prevented from running again. He sought a referendum to abolish term limits and was narrowly defeated. HOWEVER, the Bolivian Supreme court ruled that the current term limits were unconstitutional and permitted him to run for re-election.

Bolivian elections can run several rounds, and also operate on a two count system. The TREP, or “quick count”, and the official count. The quick count operates in a similar fashion to our exit polls, essentially so that there can be results reported on that evening.

To win in the first round, a candidate needs to get at least 50% of the vote, or 40% and win by 10 percentage points over the next highest candidate.

The OAS (Organization of American States) has been promoting this process and helping to implement it in several countries, including Bolivia.

Unfortunately, having what appears to be two sets of votes can be confusing. Essentially what happened this time.
Before the results of the quick count were in Mesa, Morales’s opponent, was already declaring victory and that he had progressed to the second round.

When the quick count (which usually never reaches 100%) reached around 84%, the electoral authority held a press conference reporting the result: Morales at 45.71% and Mesa at 37.84% (a difference of around 7 points), and stopped the count. This seemed to imply a second round.

This is where the controversy begins.

Please remember the quick count is not the official count.

The electoral authority gave several plausible reasons for stopping the quick count: the official count had started and they wanted to avoid confusion, they promised to release more than 80% of the quick count and they did, and they were investigating the server of one of their contractors.

However, The OAS and Mesa jumped on this. They condemned the Bolivian electoral authority and demanded that they restart the quick count even though national election quick counts never reach 100% because it’s hard to count rural votes in that time frame.

The electoral authority caved to their demands and restarted the quick count (due in part to the pressure from media reports conflating it with the official count.) At over 95% they released the latest results: Morales had 48.86% to Mesa’s 36.72% – a lead of over 10 points. All hell broke loose.

Once again, a reminder that this is not the official tally.

They were immediately accused of fraud by both the opposition party and the OAS, who claimed that the jump for Morales between those two data points was impossible.

Kevin Cashman @kevinmcashman

The OAS fits trend lines to cherry-picked data to produce graphs like these, and take issue with a lot of ways the quick count was conducted. It’s a bit suspicious to say the least: https://twitter.com/erichashbawm/status/1193665959682363392 

Raprock Obama @erichashbawm
Replying to @erichashbawm and 3 others

I’m a Stats major. You don’t fit strange polynomials to a single piece of time series data like this unless you’re:
1. incompetent and an idiot
2. you want to mislead people

I can’t recall ever fitting polynomials to a single time-series. It’s a baffling choice.

It’s also important to note that the OAS has been consistently critical of left wing run countries, while turning a blind eye or outright supporting right wing bordering on fascist regimes.

However, The CEPR notes that this jump in favor of Morales was actually not just possible but entirely probable and in trend with the current count and exit polls. This is due to Morales’s popularity in the rural districts which always report later.

Kevin Cashman @kevinmcashman

But as our paper shows, it’s not only possible, it’s probable. There’s little change in trend between before the quick count was suspended and after it was restarted. http://cepr.net/publications/reports/bolivia-elections-2019-11 

When the official count was released it confirmed the quick count: Morales won in the first round 47.08% to 36.51%. This also lines up with pre-election polls which predominantly predicted Morales’s win.

Unfortunately the damage was already done. Opposition members began attacking Morales supporters in the streets, which then lead to retaliatory violence. The OAS demanded an audit. Morales agreed to abide by its results. Mesa did not.

The OAS doubles down and the audit focuses primarily on the quick count (not the official count) and still tries to claim it was manipulated.

They also claim that chain of custody was broken on the official count voting sheets, however this is unverifiable because opposition protestors BURNED DOWN the electoral buildings.

The flawed audit emboldened the opposition who then attacked and KIDNAPPED family members to force resignations.
Morales was forced to abide by the OAS audit results calling for a new election, but ultimately it didn’t matter because the military forced him to resign.

It’s (*extreme sarcasm*) comforting to know that US backed organizations like the OAS enable us to still meddle with socialist leaning South American countries to the detriment of everyone, even in 2019. Happy Military Coup – er – I mean Veterans Day?

(Photo: Javier Mamani/Getty Images)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Have a tip we should know? tips@themarysue.com

 

Posta under Latin-Amerika, Our global world, Politikk, samfunn | Merkt , , , , , , , , , , | 2 kommentarar

The Military Coup in Bolivia – US hands off Bolivia!

PSL Statement

Download PDF flyer

PSL statement: We condemn military coup; US hands off Bolivia

Bolivian president Evo Morales. Photo: Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en

Bolivian president Evo Morales. Photo: Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en

The Party for Socialism and Liberation strongly condemns the military coup in Bolivia, and extends our solidarity to the Bolivian people who are struggling to defend the massive gains won under the leadership of President Evo Morales in the face of this counter-revolution. U.S. imperialism is clearly the sponsor of the coup and we are outraged at this crime against Bolivian sovereignty and democracy.

The goal of the coup is to restore the absolute authority of the Bolivian elites who rule as clients of the United States. They despise the country’s Indigenous majority and want to eviscerate the rights of the working class.

The coup also has a clear regional significance. Progressive and revolutionary forces have been on the march over the past year. President López Obrador’s new government in Mexico committed itself to non-interference in the sovereign affairs of the nations of Latin America. Venezuela defeated the U.S.-backed coup attempt of Juan Guaidó. An uprising in Ecuador forced the government to flee the capital city and cancel an IMF-imposed austerity package. An ongoing rebellion in Chile has brought historic crowds into the streets and put the right wing government of Sebastian Piñera on the defensive despite vicious repression by the police and military. The right wing government in Argentina was voted out of office in favor of the progressive Alberto Fernández-Cristina Fernández presidential ticket. And immediately preceding the Bolivian coup, wrongfully imprisoned ex-President Lula was freed.

The Bolivian ruling class and their military are following the dictates of the U.S. government, which has worked overtime to turn back the leftwing tide sweeping Latin America.

Upon assuming the presidency in 2006, President Morales nationalized the country’s oil and gas wealth. This wealth was used to meet the needs of the people and promote economic development. Morales’ Movement for Socialism (MAS) drew its support from the working class of Bolivia, whose population is majority Indigenous, and transformed Bolivia from one of the poorest countries in the world to the fastest-growing economy in the region. Evo Morales is the first Indigenous President in the history of Bolivia, and his presidency has posed a challenge to the racist ruling elite by empowering the Indigenous majority culturally and economically.

The battle in Bolivia and all of Latin America continues between the forces that want to empower the people and those that want to restore the power and wealth of the elite. People in the United States can play an important role in this intense struggle by pressuring our imperialist government to end its war on the people in Latin America and the Caribbean. U.S. hands off Bolivia!

Posta under Latin-Amerika, Our global world, Politikk, samfunn, Socialism | Merkt , , , , , , , , , , | Kommenter innlegget

The Military Coup in Bolivia – US hands off Bolivia! II

Demonstranter skal ha tatt over Venezuelas ambassade i Bolivia

Hettekledde demonstranter skal ifølge Venezeulas ambassadør ha tatt over ambassaden i La Paz, der de skal ha dukket opp med dynamitt og skjold.

Et ødelagt bilde av Evo Morales som nå har gått av som president i Bolivia. Bildet er fra hans hjem i Cochabamba, der motstandere brøt inn i hjemmet hans søndag. Foto: AP / NTB scanpix 

Et ødelagt bilde av Evo Morales som nå har gått av som president i Bolivia. Bildet er fra hans hjem i Cochabamba, der motstandere brøt inn i hjemmet hans søndag. Foto: AP / NTB scanpix

– Hettekledde demonstranter med dynamitt og skjold har tatt over den venezuelanske ambassaden i Bolivia. Vi er ok og i trygghet, men de ønsker å begå en massakre mot oss, sier ambassadør Crisbeylee González til det statlige nyhetsbyrået ABI og fortsetter:

– Hjelp oss å rapportere om dette barbariet.

Ambassadøren kom med lignende uttalelser til det cubanske nyhetsbyrået Prensa Latina.

Venezuelas president Nicolás Maduro støtter den avgåtte presidenten Evo Morales og uttalte søndag at han kaller det et kupp at presidenten måtte trekke seg. Morales trakk seg som følge av uker med protester etter anklager om valgfusk.

(©NTB) utenriks

Latinamerikanske presidenter fordømmer «statskupp» i Bolivia

Presidentene i Venezuela, Argentina og Nicaragua fordømmer det de kaller et statskupp i Bolivia.

  • FOTO: Foto: AP / NTB scanpix Venezuelas president Nicolás Maduro (i midten) sammen med Cubas president Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez (t.h.) og tidligere president Raul Castro.

Uttalelsene til presidentene kommer etter at Evo Morales trakk seg som Bolivias president søndag etter anklager om valgfusk.

I en uttalelse på Twitter uttrykker Venezuelas Nicolás Maduro støtte til Morales og det bolivianske folk som han mener er offer for rasisme.

– Vi fordømmer kategorisk kuppet mot vår bror, presidenten, skriver Maduro.

Også Argentinas president Alberto Fernández mener det var et statskupp.

– Et statskupp fant sted i Bolivia som et resultat av felles aksjoner fra voldelige sivile, selvutnevnte politifolk og hærens passivitet, uttaler Fernández på Twitter.

Fernández skriver videre at han støtter demokratiske institusjoner og oppfordrer landet til å snarest arrangere et nytt valg.

Nicaraguas president Daniel Ortega sier de fordømmer «en fascistisk praksis som ignorerer konstitusjonen, lovene og institusjonalismen som styrer det demokratiske livet til nasjoner». Han sier de også fordømmer det han omtaler som et statskupp.

(©NTB) utenriks

See also:

telesurenglish.net

workers.org

Posta under Latin-Amerika, Our global world, Politikk, samfunn | Merkt , , , , , , , , , , | Kommenter innlegget

No Extradition of Julian Assange!

Free Julian Assange. Do not extradite him.

Click here to sign the following petition.

To the Government of the United Kingdom:

We the undersigned respectfully call on the appropriate authorities of the United Kingdom to immediately release Julian Assange, citizen of Australia, from Belmarsh prison where he is being unjustly and cruelly incarcerated.

Acting as a publisher through WikiLeaks, Mr. Assange has done the world a service in documenting the war crimes and other abuses of the United States and other governments, organizations, and corporations.

He is not charged with any crime or even misdemeanor in the United Kingdom, and has fully served his sentence for his single offense: jumping bail to avoid extradition to the United States via Sweden. He was not and is not charged with any crime in Sweden.

The sole charges against Mr. Assange originate in the United States, where he is charged with the publication of accurate information provided by informed sources, as well as with encouraging a source, and protecting a source. These are regular and necessary practices of journalism in a free and democratic society. The prosecution of a publisher for publishing accurate information that is clearly in the public interest is a threat to journalism and to democracy.

The «espionage» prosecution by the United States of a non-U.S. citizen who has not been in and is not in the United States would be an additional dangerous precedent to set.

It is quite clear that in its current treatment of Julian Assange, the United Kingdom is debasing itself as a mere instrument of political repression exercised by the United States. The current imprisonment of Mr. Assange is a blot on the United Kingdom’s judicial system, a disgrace to British decency.

There is every reason to fear an unfair trial, or cruel imprisonment without trial, in the United States. We appeal to your sense of justice to uphold the best traditions of British democracy and respect for human rights by immediately freeing, rather than extraditing, Julian Assange.

Posta under Europa, Our global world, Politic&Society | Merkt , , , , , , , | Kommenter innlegget

The US and Iran Fights for Regional Influence – Using Lebanon and Iraq (Again!)

PHOTO: cbc.ca

Iran«s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has blamed the United States and its allies for spreading «insecurity and turmoil» in Iraq and Lebanon, urging anti-government protesters in both countries to seek changes in a lawful way.

«Their people also have to know that although they have legitimate demands, those demands can be met only through the framework of legal structures,» he said on Wednesday in rare remarks addressing the wave of demonstrations that erupted in Iraq and Lebanon this month.

Speaking at a graduation ceremony at Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia Air Defence Academy, Khamenei accused «America and Western intelligence services» of inflicting damage and of creating «chaos» in the region.

«They are destroying security. This is the worst kind of hostility and the most dangerous and spiteful behaviour against a country,» he said.

Khamenei’s speech came as the US called for the formation of a new Lebanese government that would be responsive to the needs of the country’s population.

«The Lebanese people want an efficient and effective government, economic reform, and an end to endemic corruption,» Pompeo said in a statement after the resignation on Tuesday of embattled Prime Minister Saad Hariri in the face of nearly two weeks of mass protests demanding the departure of the country’s entire political elite.

Al Jazeera’s Zeina Khodr, reporting from the capital, Beirut, said that with both Washington and Tehran weighing in on Lebanon’s political crisis, the country was «yet again caught in the arena of the US-Iranian struggle».

The nationwide protests in Lebanon erupted amid growing anger over official corruption, poor public services and years of economic mismanagement.

Iran is a major backer of Lebanon’s Shia Hezbollah group, which has so far resisted calls to change the status quo. The group and its allies are part of a coalition government that came to power last year after months of negotiations.

While some supporters of Hezbollah and the allied Amal Movement have attacked anti-government demonstrators in central Beirut, the protests have largely been peaceful and united people from a wide range of backgrounds.

Lebanese protesters have rarely called out Iran and Hezbollah, but a common chant, «All means all,» implies that none of Lebanon’s factions, including Hezbollah and its allies, are beyond reproach.

Iraq protests

In Iraq, tens of thousands of people have taken to the streets this week in a second wave of protests against a government and political elite they say is corrupt and out of touch.

The mass demonstrations have been met with a combative response from security forces, who have used tear gas, rubber bullets and live ammunition against those taking to the streets. More than 200 protesters have been killed since the unrest began on October 1.

Many protests say the country’s vast oil wealth has not adequately trickled down to its citizens, with millions lacking access to adequate healthcare, education, clean water and electricity.

In recent months, rising tensions between Baghdad’s two main allies, the United States and Iran, have raised fears among many Iraqis of their country being caught in the middle of the escalating struggle between Washington and Tehran for regional influence.

Both the US and Iran enjoy significant political and military influence in Iraq, and protesters this month have accused the political elite of being subservient to one or the other without concern for the needs of ordinary people.

SOURCE: Al Jazeera and news agencies –

More:

Posta under Asia, Our global world, Politic&Society | Merkt , , , , | Kommenter innlegget